🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined a collective professional network test recently after viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how content are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."