🔗 Share this article

In the eyes of Natalia Molina and longtime Mexican American, the most memorable highlight of the World Series did not happen during the tense final game last Saturday, when her squad pulled off one death-defying escape feat after another before prevailing in overtime against the opposing team.

It came in the previous game, when two supporting players, the Puerto Rican player and Miguel Rojas, executed a electrifying, game-winning play that simultaneously challenged many harmful misconceptions touted about Hispanic people in recent years.

The play in itself was stunning: Hernández raced in from the outfield to catch a ball he at first lost in the bright lights, then fired it to the infield to secure another, decisive play. Rojas, at second base, caught the ball moments before a runner collided with him, knocking him backwards.

This wasn't merely a great sporting achievement, perhaps the key turn in momentum in the Dodgers' favor after looking for most of the games like the underdog side. To her, it was exhilarating, politically and culturally, a badly needed uplift for the community and for Los Angeles after months of enforcement actions, troops monitoring the neighborhoods, and a steady stream of negativity from official sources.

"The players put forth this alternative story," said Molina. "Everyone witnessed Latinos showing an infectious pride and joy in what they do, acting as leaders on the team, having a different kind of confidence. They're energetic, they're cheering, they're removing their shirts."

"This represented such a contrast with what we see on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos detained and chased down. It is so easy to be disheartened right now."

Not that it's exactly straightforward to be a team fan these days – for her or for the many of other fans who attend regularly to home games and fill up as many as half of the venue's 50,000 spots each time.

A Mixed Relationship with the Team

After intensified enforcement operations began in the city in June, and national guard units were deployed into the city to respond to ensuing protests, two of the local soccer teams quickly issued messages of support with immigrant families – but not the baseball team.

Management stated the Dodgers prefer to steer clear of politics – a view colored, possibly, by the fact that a sizable minority of the fans, including some Hispanic fans, are followers of current leaders. After significant external demands, the organization later committed $1m in aid for families directly impacted by the operations but made no public criticism of the administration.

White House Visit and Historical Heritage

Three months before, the team did not delay in agreeing to an invitation to mark their 2024 championship win at the White House – a move that local writers described as "disappointing … weak … and contradictory", considering the Dodgers' boast in having been the pioneering professional team to break the racial segregation in the mid-20th century and the regular invocations of that legacy and the principles it embodies by executives and current and former players. Several team members including the manager had voiced reluctance to go to the event during the first term but then reconsidered or succumbed to pressure from team management.

Corporate Ownership and Supporter Conflicts

An additional complication for fans is that the Dodgers are controlled by a large investment group, Guggenheim Partners, whose investments, according to sources and its own released financial documents, involve a stake in a private prison company that operates detention centers. The group's leadership has stated repeatedly that it aims to stay out of politics, but its critics say the inaction – and the investment – are their own form of compliance to current agendas.

All of that add up to significant mixed feelings among Hispanic fans in particular – feelings that surfaced even in the euphoria of this year's hard-won World Series triumph and the ensuing explosion of Dodgers pride across Los Angeles.

"Is it okay to root for the Dodgers?" local columnist one observer reflected at the start of the postseason in an thoughtful article pondering on "Dodger blue in our veins, but doubt in our minds". Galindo was unable to ultimately bring himself to watch the championship, but he still felt strongly, to the extent that he decided his personal boycott must have brought the squad the luck it required to succeed.

Separating the Team from the Owners

Many supporters who have similar misgivings seem to have concluded that they can continue to support the players and its roster of global players, featuring the Japanese superstar Shohei Ohtani, while expressing disdain on the team's business leadership. At no place was this more evident than at the championship parade at Dodger Stadium on the following day, when the packed audience cheered in support of the coach and his players but jeered the executive and the chief executive of the investors.

"The executives in suits do not get to claim our players from us," the fan said. "We have been with the team for more time than they have."

Historical Background and Community Impact

The issue, however, runs deeper than only the team's current owners. The agreement that moved the Brooklyn Dodgers to Los Angeles in the 1950s involved the city demolishing three working-class Hispanic communities on a hill above the city center and then transferring the property to the team for a fraction of its actual worth. A song on a 2005 album that chronicles the story has an low-income parking attendant at the stadium revealing that the house he forfeited to removal is now a part of the field.

A prominent commentator, perhaps southern California most influential Latino writer and broadcaster, sees a darker side to the long, dysfunctional dynamic between the franchise and its audience. He calls the Dodgers the popular snack of baseball, "a business organization with an excessive, even unhealthy devotion by too many Latinos" that has been shortchanging its supporters for decades.

"They've acted around Hispanic followers while picking their pockets with the other hand for so much time because they have been able to avoid consequences," Arellano noted over the warmer months, when calls to boycott the organization over its absence of response to the raids were upended by the awkward fact that turnout at matches did not dip, even at the peak of the protests when downtown LA was under to a nightly curfew.

International Players and Fan Bonds

Distinguishing the squad from its corporate owners is not a easy matter, {